There are no shortages to the problems facing our nation. Take your pick: Revitalizing the Economy, Ending the War in Iraq, Providing Health Care for All, Protecting America, Renewing American Global Leadership, Civil Rights, Defense, Disabilities, Economy, Education, Energy and Environment, Ethics, Family, Fiscal, Foreign Policy, Health Care, Homeland Security, Immigration, Iraq, Poverty, Rural, Seniors and Social Security, Service, Taxes, Technology, Urban Policy, Veterans, Women’s Rights.
We invite you to take any one of these topics and share your ideas for a way to begin to use innovation and creativity to leverage a workable solution. Please use the respond box below to send us your thoughts. All we ask is that you start out with the following sentence.
My name is (first name or full name) and I think we can address the problem of (pick one from the list above) by doing this:
And then give us your thoughts. We will take the time and effort to send every comment or suggestion we receive to the Transition Team for forwarding to the proper channels. Share your ideas as an individual. Share your ideas as a team. Share your ideas as a company or as a classroom. But share them here. And share them now.
We are doing this to prove that the creative community, if given a chance, can be a great value to this Nation. Your genius needs to be heard.
My name is John Stanton and I think we can address the problem of Renewing Global Leadership by doing this:
Stop acting like movie stars and start acting like somebody who needs the money. We have become entirely too arrogant for our own good. We need to get over ourselves and start to realize that there are other countries out there who do what we do and do it a whole lot better.
We have become masters at doing just enough to get by. The result is that we have lost our leadership role in dozens of industries because our products are no longer good enough to be leaders in their respective fields.
The government needs to become cheerleaders for the return of quality to American-made products. They need to be the symbol of “Job well done,” rather than “Least common denominator.
My idea is to make “Made In America” mean something once again.
By: John Stanton on November 23, 2008
at 7:14 am
My name is Sergio B. and I think we can address the problem of Revitalizing The Economy by doing this:
Instead of bailing out the Auto Industry with billions, why doesn’t the Federal Government use that money to BUY a bunch of cars from GM, Ford and Chrysler. And use it’s clout as their biggest fleet owner to specify a fuel-efficient hybrid be built to maximum safety specifications. And that each car be pained the same color (U.S. Green) to promote sustainability. Now that would be a way cool way to throw away our tax dollars.
By: Sergio B. on November 26, 2008
at 5:12 pm
My name is Debra Smithfield and I think we can address the problem of Ethics by doing this:
Everybody knows that Congress is bought and sold by corporate America. Why don’t we just let the companies sponsor legislation like they do sporting events. Like, “This bill to cut down on the level of allowable PCBs in river water is sponsored by General Electric. It will be known as the GE Clean Water Act.”
By: Debra Smithfield on November 26, 2008
at 6:19 pm
My name is Bryan DeLuca and I think we can address the problem of Energy and the Environment by doing this:
Railroads have a network of right of ways that criss-cross our country from coast to coast and from border to border. My idea is to put solar panels on the tops of all of those containers they carry and have them charge batteries that can be unloaded and discharged at the end of each run. In fact they might even be able to supply enough electricity to power the diesel electric locomotives that pull those trains for a portion of miles which could save millions in diesel fuel. Thanks for a chance to give my two bits.
By: Bryan DeLuca on November 27, 2008
at 6:43 am
My name is Mary Baum, and I think we can address the problem of renewing global leadership by finishing the job of building out our nation’s broadband internet connections, so every American, including in rural areas, has high-speed access at a reasonable price:
It’s hard for me to see how the US can lead the world in all the areas we need to when our internet access is so spotty and slow. We simply must have access that covers the entire country – including every rural address – at speeds that start where cable and fast DSL modems are now and increase from there. We should also have wireless access along the interstate highways and on mass transit.
From what I read, we are now 15th in the world in speed and access and falling fast, and it’s no wonder, when the product comes from a duopoly of phone and cable companies. For them, full-speed internet, and the applications it supports, are a direct threat to their traditional business models – not to mention the copper wires and coaxial cables they’ve poured so many billions into maintaining all these decades.
It’s understandable that those entities would put their other revenue streams front and center. But it’s hardly appropriate that their priorities should govern what happens on an internet that belongs to everyone – and in the process cripple our businesses, academics and families in an age where instant online communication is everything.
By: Mary Baum on November 28, 2008
at 6:35 pm
My name is Barry Bremmen and I think we can address the problem of Immigration by doing this:
I think anybody who wants to come to the USA should pay their admission at the border. We could use a sliding scale from $25-$200 a day depending upon how much they earn while they are here. The immigrant would have to check in electronically once every 24 hours. If they fail to check in their card is revoked and they would have to pay a stiff fine to renew it. The fees they pay would be put against the cost of public services for illegals.
By: Barry Bremmen on December 1, 2008
at 2:21 pm
TOP 20 IDEAS FROM CHANGE.GOV
This comment was made by Ben(nyc) on the Automotive Bailout at: http://change.gov/page/content/discusseconomy. Please feel free to comment on it in the box below:
With any bell curve, the counter-argument against “Too big to Fail” is “Too small to Fail”. Take for example Tesla Motors, an electric car US manufacturer. If you infuse $34 Billion into that one company they can produce their planned electric sedan quicker and create dealerships in many states.
Electric car adoption will then spur development of an electric grid such as:
http://features.csmonitor.com/innovation/2008/12/...
If you could travel back to the past would you have invested in the dominant horse and carriage company because it was “Too Big to Fail” or would you have invested in Henry Ford’s Model T?
The choice today is Tesla Motors – American, Electric Now, Green, Creative, Efficient, New
or Big 3 – American, Electric in 2010?, Green? (Can’t spell it), Creative (Can’t even ask for money without a private jet), Efficient in myopia (Couldn’t see the writing on the wall since the first gas crisis in the 1970s), Old (Cannot handle the new global environment)
Work with Tesla. Expand their reach and have them hire displaced Big 3 employees with the most creativity and desire to take the car business to the next level. Look ahead not back because nobody drives a car backwards for long because that would be dangerous.
By: OCA Editors on December 4, 2008
at 4:17 pm
TOP 20 IDEAS FROM CHANGE.GOV
This comment was made byLee Flyer on the Corporate Regulation at: http://change.gov/page/content/discusseconomy. Please feel free to comment on it in the box below:
Yes, yes, yes, I’m so glad you guys are bringing this issue to the table! We need to think in terms of an “economic ecosystem” – the economy and our quality of life is healthiest when we have many smaller, diverse, competing businesses, and it suffers when there are only a few companies who control most of any given industry – especially if one of those companies inevitabably stumbles.
It is not a “free market” when there’s no real competition and no protection for the public (or for other businesses) from these monolithic companies. Our antitrust laws have no teeth and as Matthew points out, consolidation is even encouraged. People just want their stock prices to go up and they don’t care how it’s accomplished, not realizing that a company can’t grow indefinitely and still be a legitimate business. Eventually they have to start cutting corners, compromising quality, denying worker benefits, etc. in order to continually increase their profit margins. Then they start buying up other businesses, and undercutting competitors for the purpose of driving them out of business. The result is what we have today: Once-successful, innovative companies turn into predatory cutthroats who are only concerned with increasing market share and have become too inefficient to succeed on merit anymore, yet they try to hobble any nimbler companies who can. Money for research, which could keep them innovating, dries up because shareholders don’t want their money tied up in long term and potentially risky R&D projects.
Many studies have shown that small and midsized companies invest much more back into their business. They tend to pay their skilled employees better, give them better training and work environments, and focus more on quality and customer service than the big monoliths, as well as being more nimble in making and implementing decisions. And yet, they still remain very profitable for their owners. And if a smaller company does fail due to mismanagement, it will only affect a small number of people.
This is not to say that economies of scale aren’t necessary or that any large company is bad. But there’s large and then there’s … LARGE. The word has been completely reinvented in the last 20 years given the technology explosion and globalization of the economy, and we need to have some new economic thinking and new corporate law to respond to these new circumstances.
By: OCA Editors on December 4, 2008
at 7:40 pm
TOP 20 IDEAS FROM CHANGE.GOV
This comment was made by TogetherinParis on the issue of Corporate Ethics at: http://change.gov/page/content/discusseconomy. Please feel free to comment on it in the box below:
I have the benefit of personal knowledge that few have. Steven Spielberg was a childhood friend of mine and I have personally contributed about two trillion dollars to the American economy. So if your best friend for a summer sent a big limo to pick you up so he could give you a million dollars, what would you do? I turned him down for you, so I could know in my poverty what was right, right here, right now. You are quite right that doing special favors and being good at it is an important part of being a good CEO. We don’t like to admit it (indeed, my old high school girl friend wrote a tome against it at the world bank), but payola (bribes, payoffs, special discounts for the military and members of Congress, etc.) is an economic function in human affairs. We can try to cap all the geysers or we can rope them off. You can try to drill on your oil lease without benefitting the rebel captains, but you might not pull it off.
The lavish, private jet lifestyle of executives is ridiculous, sure. I mean, who would pay $500.00 for a hair cut? (Oops! Sorry, Hillary. I bought an electric clipper and do my own for almost nothing. Of course, that’s how much hair I have left, too.) In many cases it is downright unhealthy. The average joe is going to get more and better with one wife than CEO’s take from a hundred underage teenagers. There are all sorts of downright perversions that are part of some CEO lifestyles, too. We should withhold judgment and look for results. I don’t look into your private life when I buy a quart of milk from you.
Again, the CEOs can control some things, but sometimes they don’t. Government is supposed to manage the economy. Deflation, where currency’s value increases relative to other investments, is not under CEO control. Actually, big corporate CEO’s do not control everything anyway, most of the country’s wealth is in the hands of little old ladies. The CEOs complaining to Congress have even less control under these circumstances.
And it’s OK for me to poke fun at Hillary. I recruited her into this business.
By: OCA Editors on December 4, 2008
at 7:56 pm
TOP 20 IDEAS FROM CHANGE.GOV
This comment was made by Eric Holst on the issue of Corporate Bailouts at: http://change.gov/page/content/discusseconomy. Please feel free to comment on it in the box below:
Few of us (arguably none of us) understand the true extent of our economic problems much less the solutions. Congress has authorized the Dept. of Treasury to invest and/or spend hundreds of billions of dollars of tax payer mondy to fix our economy. Except for snipets of information in the media, we have very little information about how these funds are being invested, how the funds are being used by the recipients, our return on investment. I recommend that the Obama adminstration commit to a policy of total transparency with regard to investments/expenditures to help repair the economy. The Treasury Department should initate a website with detailed information about our recovery plan, investments, expenditures, and returns to the treasury – all written in laymans langauge. This approach would help instill deeper public confidence in the recovery program and would be an admirable and welcome change from the sparse information released on the bailout program to date.
By: OCA Editors on December 4, 2008
at 8:11 pm
TOP 20 IDEAS FROM CHANGE.GOV
This comment was made by Matthew Johnson on the issue of Corporate Citizenship at: http://change.gov/page/content/discusseconomy. Please feel free to comment on it in the box below:
A lot of commenters have supported the idea of abolishing the corporate right of personhood. I want to add that I strongly believe if we were to hold a national referendum on this matter (Should corporations be granted equal rights to individuals, including all constitutional rights?) the answer would overwhelmingly be no. I think that is extremely important for our Barack and the leaders in congress to keep in mind.
This right was not granted through legislation and I don’t believe it has much popular backing. It was granted through a back door in our legal system and has been sustained because the population is not educated that it exists and about the implications of this. It is time to reign in the imbalance of corporate legal power.
By: OCA Editors on December 4, 2008
at 10:07 pm
This comment was made by Charles Vanderbuilt on the issue of Mortgage Bailouts at: http://change.gov/page/content/discusseconomy. Please feel free to comment on it in the box below:
In regard to a down payment for a home, there used to be a “Rent With Option To Buy” available for people who didn’t have the full down payment. Why couldn’t this be offered today? If a homeowner faces foreclosure or eviction, he could get a new contract. The new purchase price could be the original price, adjusted to the amount of rent paid. This would get the housing money flowing in the right direction and not overwhelm the homeowner. The amount of rent would be comparable to the original payment to the mortgage. Any discussion on this?
By: OCA Editors on December 4, 2008
at 10:29 pm
My name is Richard Heitmeyer and I think we could resolve the mortgage crisis by establishing this program
Citizens Residential Guarantee Program
established to treat the problem
and eliminate the need to bailout Wall Street
Federal Government will establish a Citizens Residential Relief Fund of $250 billion with authorization to increase the fund to $700 billion subject to congressional oversight. These funds will be used to fund a portion of a qualifying property owner monthly mortgage payment dependent upon the citizen’s financial needs.
The funds advanced will become an interest bearing superior first lien against the real estate for which the funds are funding part of the property owner’s monthly debt service.
When residence is sold at a future date the federal first lien will be liquidated. The balance of the funds will be applied to the first mortgage, if these funds are not sufficient to pay the mortgage in full the mortgage holder will incur the loss.
The benefits of this plan are:
1. property owner stays in home
2. property owner maintains home
3. property is not sold at a fire sale price therefore neighborhood real estate values maintained
4. mortgage holder holds a performing mortgage therefore eliminating massive write downs
5. debt service keeps flowing uninterrupted relieving stress on financial institution
6. foreclosure pressures on local courts reduced
7. over time housing prices increase and everyone comes out whole
The Citizens Residential Fund will address financial problems due to
1. resetting of monthly debt service due to improper or misunderstood disclosures to property owner
2. property owner unemployment problems
3. property owner health problems
4. property owner financial problems
The backbone of this country is the residential property owner, deal with his/her problems and the institutional problems with take care of themselves with enforced regulation. The American dream is home ownership lets keep it that way.
By: Richard Heitmeyer on December 5, 2008
at 12:25 am
My name is Ernest Earnest and I think we can address the problem of energy and environment by doing this:
We need to develop a strategy to review and prioritize our environmental standards based on trade offs between air quality, green house gas emissions, and economic impacts or benefits. Some technological solutions can provide benifit in all three areas, but many times, what benifits one objective detracts from another.
Congress tends to address one environmental/energy issue at a time without any standard to to balance the impacts/benefits between the three parameters.
As an example of an issue where priorities between air quality, energy independence, and climate change need to be evaluated, consider our need to shift to more fuel efficient vehicles.
We all know that, in order to achieve energy independence and meet our global obligations to reduce greenhouse gases, we must change our driving habits to embrace small fuel efficient vehicles. The Europeans and Asian counties are already way ahead in this regard. The fleet average fuel economy in Europe is already better than our congressionaly mandated CAFE standards for any time in the future.
The most fuel efficient vehicles sold in Europe cannot be imported to this county because their emission and safety standards are different than ours. Ford sells a car in Europe that gets 65mpg, but we can not import it. Over 50% of new cars sold in Europe are diesel, but our emission standards are different so only a few are available here.
Our long term goal should be to reconcile the differences between European and US standards. If we were to accommodate the current European standards on a temporary basis to allow importation of the most fuel efficient vehicles now, it would, not only speed up our move toward energy independence, but allow US manufacturers to develop “world cars” that could be sold anywhere thus improving our export market.
Adopting such a strategy, might have a small negative impact on air quality, but how do we evaluate that relative to our goal of energy independence and mitigating climate change. But, how do we decide how to balance? we need trade off standards. Any ideas?
By: Ernest Earnest on December 5, 2008
at 3:28 am
My name is River and I think we can address the problem of providing universal health care for all by doing this:
Group Americans into regions for the purpose of health insurance. For example, group together Oregon, Washington, and Idaho as the Northwest Region. Each region would have a director, either one elected by the people of the region or one appointed federally or at the state level.
The Office of the Health Care Director would invite insurance companies to compete for the privilege of serving the group. Rates would be set by law, and insurance companies would not be able to discriminate against insureds who have “pre-existing conditions”, nor would they be allowed to practice recission. Maximum lifetime caps on insurance would also be forbidden. The Office of the Director would choose a plan from among those offered, taking into consideration cost per individual, cost per family, and comprehensiveness of medical and dental service offered. That plan would then become available to every member of the region at a reasonable cost. This would allow regions to take advantage of group rates rather than forcing individuals who do not otherwise have coverage to attempt to buy insurance on their own, which is often problematic.
If some of the people in a given region did not like the region’s health insurance plan, the health plan used by members of Congress would be available to them, also at a reasonable rate (set by law).
Subsidies would be available to those who cannot afford to buy insurance on their own. The subsidies would reach individuals and families whose incomes were up to 300% of the poverty level in that region or state. They would gradually be phased out as the income level approached 300%. This could potentially be funded by an extra tax on the sale of property with a currently assessed value of over $300,000. The assessed value would be determined by the entity to which the property owner pays property taxes.
Doctors would see the value of accepting this insurance, since they would only be dealing with a single entity to get paid for their work. The insurance company chosen by the region would need to agree to pay claims in a timely manner (no more than 30 days for any reason) and it would be stipulated that the insurance company, which is not practicing medicine, would not question the doctor’s recommendation for treatment or preventative steps. Nor would the insurance company be permitted to deny care as long as premiums had been paid within 31 days prior to the treatment. Doctors, in turn, would be forbidden to own testing facilities such as cancer screenings, mammography, bone density scanners, and MRIs, unless they worked in the scanning facility as a results interpreter and in no way saw patients or made recommendations to patients for further care.
Businesses would be encouraged, via tax breaks, to contribute up to the full sum of an employee’s premium. Businesses that contribute nothing (or less than a specified amount or percentage of premium) to an employee’s premium would be taxed and that tax would help to pay for tax breaks for business that do contribute.
All medical records would be kept electronically, to be accessed by any of a patient’s doctors, and all imaging facilities would upload the images to the patient’s electronic file.
Prescription drugs would be covered, and the patient would have sliding co-pays for prescriptions such as $5 for preferred generics, $10 for more costly generics, $20 for some preferred brand-name drugs, and $40 for the other brand-name drugs. All prescription drugs would be on the insurance plan’s formulary, as would be required by their contract with the region and by law. Regional plans would be encouraged to research the best and least expensive source for prescription drugs and/or negotiate the best price with the pharmaceutical companies.
People with chronic conditions requring ongoing medical treatment would be encouraged to perform these treatments at home rather than in a clinical setting. Patients would visit their clinics once a month or so in order to receive patient education, have laboratory samples taken (blood draws, urine sample if necessary), and for monitoring purposes.
The emphasis in treatment would be preventive care rather than treatment of disease once disease is established. If lifestyle modification will help to prevent a disease from occurring, it can be prescribed by a physician. Classes in lifestyle modification following medical guidelines should be included in coverage, and failing to even attempt said lifestyle modification could possibly incur penalties of some sort, perhaps a percentage of co-insurance to be paid by the patient until he or she starts the prescribed lifestyle modification and sticks with it. If the patient is diagnosed with diabetes or pre-diabetes, visits (at a minimum, one initial visit and one follow-up) to a Certified Diabetes Educator should be covered.
A number of mental health visits to a therapist should be covered each year for patients who need this or feel they need it. Full dental coverage should also be a part of this plan.
While office visits may incur a small co-pay, co-insurance would not be required except for situations where the patient is being penalized for not making any lifestyle modification changes.
Since the regional plan and the federal plan would be the only plans in the region, doctors and other health providers would, of necessity, lower their bills to meet the payments from the insurers. Doctors and other health professionals would be forbidden to balance bill patients if reimbursement rates are lower than they would like.
Malpractice insurance would also be regulated and rates would be set by law. These plans, too, would be regional, enabling health professionals to obtain malpractice insurance at a reasonable rate.
By: River Curtis-Stanley on December 5, 2008
at 4:30 am
Hi, my name is Ross Nicholson and I believe this is how we can win the war on crime as well as the war on drugs, end the American police state, and end incarceration in our country.
Both criminal behavior and addictive drug seeking behavior are amenable to pheromone therapy. 150 mg of older adult male facial skin surface lipid (yes the grease on the end of your noses, gentlemen) p.o. (by mouth) cures these behaviors and appetites instantly. n =92. The change is detected within 24 hours. The teenager asks, ASKS to do chores. If a drop out, the teenager returns to school, grades improve dramatically. The former drug-addicted delinquent with a 24 year old sex partner becomes instead and instantly, the pride of his/her mother and father–and the sex partner is ditched in favor of parent-approved age-appropriate social interaction.
The facial skin surface lipid is passed in kissing between the father and the child. It consists of more than 725 chemicals with the quirky stereochemical characteristics of chemicals known to be pheromones in other animals. One component, sebaleic acid, is found nowhere else in nature and marks us all as human. Side effects include jealousy and a following of the donor effect, both last less than a week in most cases.
100% of probands recovered from delinquency and/or drug addiction. There have been 92 trials so far, every single one has been a dramatic cure.
By: Ross Nicholson on December 5, 2008
at 4:37 am
Please append. I can upload video?
BBC-TV interview Discovery Channel: “The Kiss.” 1989
CBC-TV National Film Board of Canada interview; “Slippery Blisses.” 1998
Peer-reviewed medical journal articles:
Nicholson B., Pheromones cause disease: pheromone/odourant transduction. Med Hypotheses. 2001 Sep;57(3):361-77.
Nicholson B., Pheromones cause disease: the exocrinology of anorexia nervosa. Med Hypotheses. 2000 Mar;54(3):438-43.
Nicholson B., Does kissing aid human bonding by semiochemical addiction? Br J Dermatol. 1984 Nov;111(5):623-7.
Ross: We don’t have the bandwidth to host your video but we will publish a link to it if you provide one. –hw
By: Ross Nicholson on December 5, 2008
at 4:41 am
There should be a 380 billion dollar direct consumer spending stimulus, that will create 7.6 million part-time jobs – grossing 50K – netting 25K-30K. This will also generate 7.6 million consumers. This spending stimulus would create new support systems for this economy, and two new flat, or temporary flat taxes; that would help support a new national health-care system, and work security system. This system would produce 1.6 million part-time workers annually. The part-time jobs would be paying Americans for the utilization of their tax ID, SSN#, and bank account in a system that would give the individual a greater opportunity to access the American Dream, and stimulate the economy on a rotative basis for generations to come. The flat tax, or temporary flat tax should be $396 per person per system. It would be a one time tax from each check generated from the work security system, and taken out monthly from all other American workers; that draw weekly and monthly paychecks. We must take care of ourselves better as a nation should, if it claims to be civilized. This is Americans helping Americans, that is how it should be.
By: Shawn Floyd on December 25, 2008
at 5:36 pm
We do need systems in place to give more opprtunity to working and non-working Americans alike. Temporary taxes should be implemented also. A new tax does not always have to be permanant. It could be used when needed, then taken away also. We must learn to navagate through our economy better. It is imparative that we do so.
By: Shawn Floyd on December 31, 2008
at 3:24 am
I have an idea that would address several of the issues listed on this site. I have been looking for a way to get it to the white house. I don’t want to go into too much detail on here but I know it would work. Can you help me get my ideas to the right people??? Please help me?
By: jackie on January 4, 2009
at 11:17 pm
Jackie,
The process for getting ideas to the transition team is very simple. Post it as a proposal on change.gov. The first step is to post your idea at http://change.gov/page/s/yourvision or at http://change.gov/open_government/yourseatatthetable. These are the current sections dedicated for proposals. Or you can research which of the policy groups would be best suited for your idea and send it to them via Fed-Ex. The policy groups are listed at http://change.gov/learn/policy_working_groups. If you have concerns about your ideas being ripped off, then a government office is not the place for you. Anything submitted to the Administration is posted on the web for public viewing and comment. It is protected by the Creative Commons agreements outlined at http://change.gov/about/copyright_policy. This is not an easy task, but they are working hard to get back to all who submit proposals. Unfortunately, there are no shortcuts in dealing with the Feds. Best of luck. Harry Webber
By: The Committee on January 7, 2009
at 10:01 pm
Right Now the economic plan lacks meaningful short term stimulus. If a proposal to create 7.6 million part-time jobs / consumers in a 12 month period, not workable. Then you must say why you feel that it will not work. Simply to claim that it will not work, based upon feeling without proof is racism. I am not talking about the color aspect of racism, I am talking about the superior mindset aspect of racism, that is used in this nation; to disagree with opposing ideas and thoughts, and then are disguarded by an intellectual systematic form of racism. This needs to stop. It is very counter productive. Racism is colorless to you know. There are many forms of racism, but when you know what racism is, the forms are not that well hidden anymore. They are quite obvious. Please stop utilizing all forms of racism.
By: Shawn Floyd on January 19, 2009
at 3:20 pm